News
- School Safety Congressional Testimony:House Homeland Security Committee 5/17/07
- House Education and Labor Committee 4/23/07
- School Board News NSBA Convention 2007 San Francisco
- School Board News NSBA Convention 2006 Chicago
Quick Links
- School Emergency Plan Evaluations
- School Security Assessments
- School Crisis Tabletop Exercises
- Post-Crisis School Safety Support
- Emergency & School Safety Media Training
- School Bus Security & Emergency Training
- School Gang Training
- School Terrorism Training
- School Terrorism Preparedness Tips
- Proactive School Security & Crisis Training
Bullying
Bullying has received a
significant amount of attention following a number of
high-profile school shootings and related incidents of
violence in the late 1990 and early 2000 school years. The
issue of bullying has recently become a hot topic of
conversation in the school safety field, in fact to a point
which some believe has become overkill. One news
article described it as "all the rage in scientific
research."
Bullying is one threat of many on a broad continuum of potential school safety threats. We believe bullying to be a serious issue and worthy of reasonable attention, awareness, and action. We also believe that bullying is but one of many factors which must be taken into consideration in developing safe schools prevention, intervention, and enforcement plans, and that bully-prevention efforts and initiatives are but one of a many strategies in a comprehensive school safety program. Bullying is neither a stand-alone, single cause for all school violence, nor is bullying prevention alone a panacea or cure-all for school violence.
A couple recent reports on bullying research studies did catch our attention. In a study conducted by psychiatrists at The Menninger Clinic in Houston, nearly half of elementary school teachers admitted to bullying students. Most attributed it to a lack of classroom discipline, according to one news report on the study.
"Although this approach will not completely eliminate bullying, research has shown that it would at least cut down on the areas where violence is likely to occur," he was attributed as saying. His recommendation: "This focus underscores the importance of viewing school bullying as both an individual- and organizational-level phenomenon."
We believe these studies reinforce that having firm, fair, and consistent discipline in our schools reduces the likelihood of crime and violence. Such discipline, combined with balanced and reasonable security measures, can create a safe and secure climate, which can in turn reduce the likelihood of bullying, disciplinary violations, violence, and crime.
For facts and resources on bullying issues, see:
National Association of School Psychologists
Bullying: Facts for Schools and Parents
A number of state legislatures have proposed laws requiring schools to have anti-bullying policies and programs, and more recently a federal legislator even proposed national legislation on bullying.
"Bullying" often refers to verbal, physical, or other acts committed by a student to harass, intimidate, or cause harm to another student. The behaviors attributed to bullying may include verbal threats, menacing, harassment, intimidation, assaults, disruption of the school environment and associated disorderly conduct, and related behaviors. When discussing "bullying," the focus should be on the inappropriate behaviors rather than a generic, undefined label of "bullying."
The vast majority of schools in the nation, if not all schools, already have disciplinary policies to address these types of behavioral misconduct. The policies may not include the word "bullying" in some schools, but the behavior we refer to as bullying is typically addressed in school policies as well as possibly in criminal laws (assaults, threats/menacing, intimidation, disorderly conduct, etc.). Schools nationwide have also implemented prevention and intervention programs to prevent and address this type of behavior, especially post-Columbine.
However, it appears as if we are on the early end of a politically-correct trend of states creating mandatory anti-bullying laws. It also appears as if some in the school safety field are moving in the direction of over-emphasizing bullying as the cause of all school safety threats. Defining bullying beyond the aforementioned behaviors (which are typically already addressed in school policy and other laws) is extremely difficult to do legislatively and it can be argued that many forms of violence could be whittled down to be labeled as "bullying" depending upon formal definitions and those interpreting what is and is not "bullying."
Bullying is an important issue which adversely impacts school safety. But there are many other issues contributing to interpersonal conflicts, violence, and crime in our schools as well. "He said, she said" rumors, "boyfriend, girlfriend" issues, disrespect, gang conflicts, and many other factors can lead to school violence. Whittling all of these down to what some would like to describe as "bullying" is a far stretch and an over-emphasis on "bullying" is, in our opinion, an extreme and inappropriate approach to school safety.
Effective school safety planning requires a balanced emphasis on safe schools components ranging from prevention and intervention programs to security and emergency preparedness strategies. Legislative and programmatic emphasis of one safe schools strategy over the others which make up comprehensive safe school planning may be popular and politically correct, but it is not the most effective approach. A skewed over-emphasis on bullying issues is no more appropriate and effective than a skewed emphasis on security and emergency planning.
The vast majority of schools have policies to deal with harassment and disruption of the educational environment. Fewer schools have funding to develop and implement anti-bullying specific programs --- something not included in most proposed anti-bullying legislation. While bullying is certainly one issue challenging school safety, unfunded state mandates and an overemphasis on any one component of school safety will likely have minimal impact on school safety and could potentially upset the comprehensive approach to school safe recommended by most school safety professionals.
For additional information, email Ken Trump.